A machine,
not a vision deck.
A studio with engineering discipline where it counts: conviction earned before capital, clean cap tables, and a Swiss, EU-compliant foundation.
One studio.
Direct ownership. Nothing pooled.
Living Scale Up is a venture studio, not a fund. We build companies on our own balance sheet and hold founding equity in each one. There is no pooled vehicle: we do not operate, manage or market a fund or collective investment scheme, and we are not supervised by FINMA. Invited investors co-invest directly into an individual venture at launch — one company, one cap table, one decision at a time. You see the venture, the evidence and the terms before you commit, and you hold shares in that company, not units in a structure. That is the model.
Equity at the source
The studio holds founding positions in the ventures it builds — earned by building, not bought at a markup. It funds Design and Prove itself, and operates the shared rails each venture inherits. Studio-level capital is not open to outside investors.
Direct, by invitation
Invited partners invest directly into an individual venture at launch — after conviction is earned, before scale. Each investment is made on terms agreed with that venture, not through any vehicle managed by Living Scale Up. We do not operate or market a fund.
Most losses are taken before you arrive
Most concepts die in Design, against a synthetic cohort, before a venture entity exists and before any co-investor is invited — that is where the studio spends its failure budget. It does not remove yours: early-stage equity carries full risk, and total loss of capital is a realistic outcome.
Rules that adapt
like the companies
we build.
Most firms fix their rules in a deck before they have lived a single deal, then renegotiate them in corners. We do the opposite, and we apply our own thesis to ourselves: the rulebook is versioned, dated, and revised in public as evidence arrives. AI is rewriting how companies are built faster than any static rulebook survives — a studio that hard-codes its economics in month two is either guessing or bluffing. What we commit to now are the principles that will not move. The numbers arrive as they are earned, on the schedule below.
We publish rules once we have lived them, not before. Each milestone below adds a permanent, dated section to this page. Hold us to the sequence: a milestone reached without its disclosure is a miss, and we log misses the same way we log corrections.
Studio-born
compounds faster.
Benchmark data on the venture-studio model versus traditional venture baselines. It is the standard we hold ourselves to — and we label every industry figure with its source and vintage rather than repeating it as our own. Strongest evidence first: the LP-verified figure leads, the self-reported one follows, and the number that cuts against the model stays on the page. See the facts page for the full set with denominators.
VAULT FUND, 202360%33%
SELF-REPORTED, 14 STUDIOS53%21.3%
3,452 PITCHBOOK DEALS, 202424%38%
Read us the way
you would diligence us.
What we removed, and when
"$3.48M revenue per employee — removed. The figure is not in that paper." Every correction is dated and kept. Six widely-circulated numbers were declined in public on 3 August 2026 rather than quietly omitted. The record.
The case against our own model
The Big Venture Studio Research (2024, 3,452 PitchBook deals) reports a venture-studio exit rate of 24% against 38% for traditional VC. We publish it beside our own benchmark table. The structural objection, answered.
A portfolio is a selected sample
"Ventures that failed, were discontinued or were written off are not necessarily shown on marketing pages. A studio's public portfolio is inherently selected. We say so because it is true." Read them.
Request the
Studio Letter.
One page. Dated. Where the studio actually stands — structure, pilot status, what has been killed so far, and what we have got wrong. Written by the founder and read by a human, not a sequence. As the disclosure ladder fills, the Letter fills with it; ask for the quarterly edition and you watch the rulebook mature in real time. If a quarter is bad, the Letter will say so, because a letter that only reports good quarters is a newsletter, and we do not write newsletters.
The five a partner asks first.
Is Living Scale Up a fund?
No. Living Scale Up is a venture studio, not a fund. There is no pooled investment vehicle. The studio holds founding equity in the ventures it builds; invited qualified investors co-invest directly into an individual venture, on terms agreed with that venture. Living Scale Up is not authorised or supervised by FINMA.
How does co-investment with Living Scale Up work?
By invitation, one venture at a time. Qualified investors request the Studio Letter and confirm their eligibility; invited investors then invest directly into a specific venture at its launch, with that venture's terms disclosed in full before any commitment. Nothing on this website is an offer or solicitation.
Why does Living Scale Up not publish equity bands or ticket sizes?
The studio launched in July 2026 and publishes rules only once it has lived them. Its rulebook is versioned and dated: the alignment principles are public now, and the economics follow at the milestones listed on this page. Invited investors always see full terms before committing.
What is the status of BuddyLeader?
BuddyLeader, an AI chief of staff for the leaders of small trade businesses, is Living Scale Up's first venture. It is live in a Swiss pilot, hosted in Switzerland and nLPD-compliant. Its founder and CEO is Jonas Cosendai. It is not raising publicly.
Who may engage with Living Scale Up as an investor?
Qualified and professional investors only. Nothing on this website is an offer of securities in the United States or to any US person, or an offer or promotion to retail or non-qualified investors in the EEA or the United Kingdom. See Disclosures, section 8.