The number is compelling. The evidence may not be. Make the call, then inspect what Living Scale Up changed—and why it did not survive.
PUBLIC CLAIM RECORDManually curatedNot venture performanceNot a live agent trace
DECISION MR-2026-08-02-ASOURCE CHECK
A claim is ready for publication
“$3.48M revenue per employee for top AI-native firms.”
Attributed source
HBS / INSEAD working paper
Claim type
Company performance benchmark
Your authority
Publish, qualify or refuse
YOU CHOSE · —LSU CHOSE · REFUSE
The source measures valuation—not revenue.
The paper publishes no revenue-per-employee figure and no $200k SaaS comparator. LSU removed the claim and replaced it with the valuation-per-employee results the paper actually reports.
A company should remember not only what it knows, but what it stopped believing.
7PUBLIC DECISIONSMatched to /facts · 03 Sep 2026
Scope contract
This is a human-curated interpretation of LSU's own public record. “Matched” means faithful to the canonical facts page; it is not independent verification. Derived operating rules are labelled and do not inherit verified status.
Showing all 7 public decisions
MR-2026-08-11-AWITHDRAWN
Decision date · 11 August 2026
Design attrition-ratio publication commitment
A promised metric was withdrawn when the studio determined that its operating model did not create a meaningful denominator.
01 · ORIGINAL STATE
Published commitment
Publish concepts entered against concepts killed after the first full quarter.
02 · EVIDENCE PROBLEM
What failed
LSU does not run a funnel of ideas, so an attrition ratio would imply a denominator the studio does not operate.
03 · DECISION
Withdraw
Remove the commitment rather than allow it to lapse quietly or publish a structurally meaningless metric.
04 · PUBLISHED NOW
Resulting change
Venture discipline is described through the problems selected, the ventures created and the evidence attached to each.
05 · PUBLIC MEMORY
Rule carried forward
Do not publish a ratio unless the operating model produces a meaningful denominator.
Curated operating rule derived from this decision.
Agentic companies need more than speed. They need a way for evidence to override narrative, for consequential changes to remain inspectable, and for the next decision to inherit what the last one learned.
CONTROL
A claim can be stopped.
Publication is an external action. The record shows where LSU chose withdrawal, qualification or refusal.
MEMORY
The reason survives the edit.
Before, decision, after and derived rule remain together instead of disappearing into a corrected page.
ACCOUNTABILITY
The boundary is explicit.
This proves a public editorial discipline. It does not prove autonomous correction, internal agent performance or venture outcomes.
THE PROVING GROUND · ENTRANCE 02
First, take the decision. Then inspect what survives it.